Talk:Apoplexy

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Should

Should this be a redirect to cerebrovascular accident? I understand that the term is sometimes used to refer to something else, but that is unusual, is it not? Besides, this really seems like a dictionary definition. --Timc 03:29, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)

---

Is apoplexy the losing of consciousness as a result of the vascular compromise, or the vascular compromise that leads to the losing of consciousness ? I still don't get it .... -- PFHLai 13:58, 2004 Jun 8 (UTC)

C'mon Patrick! Those two statements are identical. This page ought to have been scrapped. Now it's here: the vascular compromise (vasospasm, if you want) leads to coma. JFW | T@lk 14:26, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Sorry for my being dumb, Dr. Wolff, but I genuinely don't get it.

The 2 statements are not identical. Is Apoplexy the "losing of consciousness" part or the "vascular compromise" part ? Must have both to call it an apoplexy ?

I've heard "apoplexy" used to mean the sudden loss of consciousness / neurological function in a mild epileptic incident (more than a 'petit mal', I suppose ?), i.e. no vascular compromise, not a stroke. Right or wrong use of the word here ?

-- PFHLai 16:09, 2004 Jun 8 (UTC)

P.S. Vasospasm ? Hey ! It's red !

I get the same meaning in my medical dictionary. You might be correct that apoplexy is any sudden neurological coma... JFW | T@lk 16:19, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)

I am under the impression that this word is now 'obsolete' as a medical term due to frequent mis-use in colloquial English. Oh, well .... -- PFHLai 03:52, 2004 Jun 11 (UTC)

Not only is the word obsolete, in older references it usually describes only the symptom of sudden collapse, not the condition causing the collapse. ANYTHING that could cause a sudden collapse leading to death - a thrombotic stroke, a hemorrhagic stroke, a ruptured berry aneurysm, a sudden and severe heart attack, a ruptured aortic aneurysm, etc., etc. - could have been called "apoplexy" in the old days, and especially before 1800, when autopsies were rare. This article should really point out that historically, "apoplexy" often described a symptom and not a disease process. --Charlene 04:10, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ok 64.131.226.247 14:54, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

==Plagiarism== is awesome! Keep it up! I love to see supposedly reputable sources engaging in disreputable actions! I should create a new wikipedia game: Find the wikitheft!

List

What is the point of the list? Many people were recorded as dying of apoplexy? Famous and non-famous people who died of apoplexy? There is probably already a category for this - it seems pointless to list numerous people here.Parkwells (talk) 13:20, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, some of the people on the list, for example Louise May Alcott, died of stroke, not Apoplexy, according to their individual article. Because of this, and the ambiguity of the use of the term, I do not see the value of the list. Bobsd (talk) 05:54, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, since apoplexy is more or less a stroke, a very common cause of death, this seems a pointless list that could run to many pages. I propose to cut it. Onanoff (talk) 12:11, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also agree - if we tried to list deaths from say, tuberculosis, we could fill many volumes. Such a poorly documented list of un-notable persons just doesn't belong here. I'm going to be bold and delete the whole thing - though I suspect it'll trigger self-appointed watchdogs who monitor large deletions, and summarily revert them. What I'm going to do isn't any kind of vandalism - it's consensus editing.Sbalfour (talk) 01:49, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Historical Term

Um HELLO! I'm new to this editing thing, but I'm just jumping in without any REAL credentials.

I was just reading about the etymology of the term, and it occurred to me that historically, due to differences in DIET, choking was far more common than stroke, or heart attack.

Just a thought. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snuttjer (talk • contribs) 13:11, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Apoplexy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100815065528/http://www.btinternet.com:80/~allan_raymond/Roumanian_Royal_Family.htm to http://www.btinternet.com/~allan_raymond/Roumanian_Royal_Family.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:53, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]