Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brennon Guilbeau
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Postdlf 22:27, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
No indication as to why he should be here — no notability mentioned. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 22:38, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Ooops; when I first nominated this for deletion, I made a mess on the Wikipedia:Votes for deletion page, which neither I nor anyone else noticed. This VfD has therefore not been officially posted. I've posted it properly now. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 11:45, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Not written by the subject himself, it seems, but by someone close to him. I dub it "friendity" and call for delete. Meelar (talk) 21:47, May 31, 2005 (UTC)
- no, you guys are all wrong. he is a local legend in new iberia. plus he eats hamburgers with a spoon. if that isn't famousnessnessness, i don't know what is. (Unsigned comment by 66.80.192.58 (talk · contribs))
- Right. Delete. -- Hadal 04:02, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete and please also note Greth Dunn, III, which I nom'd for a speedy delete. jglc | t | c 20:19, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete nn vanity. --Etacar11 01:28, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, this article does NOT need to be here. Please Delete (Unsigned vote by 170.20.96.59 (talk · contribs))
- Delete. Oy. Dcarrano 02:15, July 13, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, you can't eat hamburgers with a spoon. -Splash 02:44, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, you have to use a spoon if you do not have any teeth left, but I digress :-7 Delete anyway - Skysmith 09:06, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non notable vanity. JamesBurns 09:40, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; nn, vanity. Jaxl 12:54, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Please delete. I am actually the person who this article is about and I wanted to see how long it would stay online. It has been there further than what I expected. I won't be offended if it is gone by tomorrow.--66.80.192.58 20:03, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.