Talk:Kevin Brady

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kevin Brady article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) person(s).

South Dakota Low‑importance

	South Dakota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Dakota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of South Dakota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South DakotaWikipedia:WikiProject South DakotaTemplate:WikiProject South DakotaSouth Dakota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cavarto.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

For the record the United States supreme court never ordered any redistricting. This was the work of rick perry and the texas legislature.

The "Mike McKinney" linked in the article is a prize fighter in Florida, not a politician in Texas. Can someone disambiguate the situation? Rammer (talk) 05:18, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Additional sources needed

I just added a citations needed tag to the page. There are dozens of unsourced statements about Brady's (alleged?) opinions. This needs some clean-up. HistoricMN44 (talk) 21:19, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Republican Obamacare

can you please send redline if the legislation which will replace Obamacare? Please send to jehamlin53@gmail.com. Jehamlin (talk) 02:34, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kevin Brady. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141024140107/https://team1.sos.state.tx.us/enr/results/mar04_169_state.htm?x=0&y=218&id=176 to https://team1.sos.state.tx.us/enr/results/mar04_169_state.htm?x=0&y=218&id=176

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:15, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Tweet about about Trump impeachment

Hi Wikipedia. I tried to add the below text but it was removed with comment that twitter is not a reliable source. But in this case, i'm citing Kevin Brady's own tweet? Shouldn't that be OK? If not, i can use the related CNN article https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/10/politics/donald-trump-mike-pence-final-days-25th-amendment/index.html − In January 2021, in response to the 2021 storming of the United States Capitol and subsequent calls to impeach Donald Trump, Brady caused controversy by tweeting @RepKevinBrady (9 January 2020). "Those calling for impeachment or invoking the 25th Amendment in response to President Trump's rhetoric this week are themselves engaging in intemperate and inflammatory language and calling for action that is equally irresponsible and could well incite further violence" (Tweet) – via Twitter. {{Cite tweet}}: |date= / |number= mismatch (help)

What is the point of this sentence?

"Brady believes policies enacted by the Trump administration, including the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, helped put the U.S. economy in a robust position going into the COVID-19 pandemic."

That sentence is especially problematic when you recall the Trump administration was woefully unprepared for the COVID pandemic, so what gives?

When I first read it I thought it sounded like propaganda. But after reading it a few more times it might just be a less than carefully crafted sentence. Either way it could use some clarification. I know I can do that myself but if it were me I'd delete it, there is no point worth making in my opinion (i.e. "Brady thinks Donald's tax cutes were good!" begs the response - "who cares?" or why should we care what Brady thinks of Donald's tax cuts. Is it noteworthy? No doubt all Republicans have a "Donald's tax cuts created this miracle or that amazing result or cured my aunt Edna's gout, but is it really noteworthy? If it is indeed intended to be propaganda it should be removed, if it's supposed to add value or is deemed noteworthy that should be put in the article so it doesn't sound like propaganda (or fan fluff). Anyhow, I'm not going to try and improve it because I can't imagine how. It seems utterly irrelevant and without merit. Carry on! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8081:8740:51F:358B:E5FB:9E22:D71B (talk) 21:36, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fort Hood

I am very disappointed to say the least in our conservative leaders in this state, House and Senate alike for allowing the woke left in this country to change the name of Fort Hood. To change the name is bad enough in its self but to change it to a hispanic name is in my opinion insult to injury. As far as I know nobody was asked their opinion much lessl allowed to vote on this matter which I believe would have been the way for this to be done. As it was it was just forced upon us as more and more things are being done these days and none of our so called conservative leaders are doing a damned thing about it. 2600:100D:B060:1D32:5334:9599:D75B:6906 (talk) 20:49, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]