Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multiplex (company)

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was copyvio. —Korath (Talk) 05:28, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)

Multiplex (company)

Currently reads like an ad. Zzyzx11 07:02, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Walks, talks and quacks like one, too. Duck! Here comes a delete unless the weasel words go away, it meets styling conventions and notability is verified and supported. - Lucky 6.9 07:11, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. As poor condition as the article is, the company is quite a significant one down here in Australia. --bainer 09:03, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Notable company but the article is a copyvio of article on company's website. [1] Nominating it as such. Capitalistroadster 13:18, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.