User talk:Iorsh

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

Hypericum triquetrifolium

Уважаемый Максим! Меня зовут Илья, я научный сотрудник университета Регенсбурга, Германия, каф. Фармацевтической биологии. Я работаю над исследованием растения Hypericum triquetrifolium и в настоящий момент готовлю постер для международной конференции. Я бы хотел использовать вашу фотографию, которую вы, согласно лицензии Википедии, передали в общественное достояние. Конференция некоммерческая, разумеется, я не получаю из этого никакой материальной выгоды кроме научного интереса (даже наоборот, за участие в конференции надо заплатить кучу денег). Однако, мне хотелось бы использовать реальные кредиты и написать ваше имя как автора снимка, если позволите. Если вам это интересно, напишите, пожалуйста, после публикации постера я смогу прислать вам его копию в pdf. Спасибо, шалом, Илья. Kreecher (talk) 10:15, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image size

200px is a nice small size that keeps the taxobox from taking up too much space. My reason for using that size for all taxobox images, regardless of amount of article text, is consistancy. If the image size is larger for sparse articles, and then if that article grows, the image will need to be resized. However, I've generally moved from actually resizing the image files to using the Wiki auto-resizing that allows the user to click on the image to see it in full if they so desire. - UtherSRG 15:22, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Hello Iorsh, just now I found your very nice image Image:Anemone_coronaria.jpg. Unfortunately, something went wrong with the determination of the plants. The image shows some species of Ranunculus, propably Ranunculus asiaticus - see [1]. Anemone coronaria looks like this: [2] Please, compare the (undivided) calyx of Ranunculus with the dissected leaves beyond the flowers in Anemone. Best wishes --Franz Xaver 12:30, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Diablo

The quality of the picture is larger than most screens handle. By using the syntax that you replaced this works fine for many browsers. The thumb technology is not good for good pictures. GerardM 21:42, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Milk thistle

Message for you on Talk:Milk thistle seglea 02:09, 14 Apr 2004 (UTC)

steroid structure

I think you added the very nice chemical structure of cholesterol. If correct, may I ask please whether you found it elsewhere or whether you created it? I would like to find or construct similar structure images for the other steroid hormones for which we have articles. I downloaded Chemsketch 5.0 but I'm looking for something quicker or readymade. Suggestions or sources? thanks Alteripse 15:41, 30 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Great work on images

I was just working on WP:IFD where someone made a dupe of your picture i deleted, great work on things like Image:Corticosterone.png, and nice to include the sourcecode required to generate it. --Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 20:55, 2004 Jun 30 (UTC)

Xymtex

Image:Ephedrine.png looks very nice. What sort of license does xymtex have? Do you know of any tutorials or other online resources for it? --Eequor 16:06, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)

License ?

Hi lorsh, I'd like to know the license of the picture Image:Sucrose.png (and other structural diagrams you've uploaded). I'm answering because we use it on french wp. Thanks in advance. Tipiac 01:04, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Plants

Welcome at the plants project! TeunSpaans 07:43, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Hi Maks, and sorry if i took too long to respond. The plant Kistos you mentioned in my talk page does grow where i live. It's a rockrose used to make herbals and aromatics. Now, about the name of it I am not sure and I am not a philologist, but i think it is just the name of the plant. It does not mean (or ever meant) "youth" as far as I know. Take a look at this http://www.greece.gr/ENVIRONMENT/ScienceAndTechnology/herbalremedies.stm 11:54, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC) el:User:Gkastel

Citations

Hi Iorsh - I use standard scientific journal citation style, which is Journal 12: 34-56. - MPF 09:56, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Numerical ordinary differential equations

I reverted your change on Numerical ordinary differential equations. The consensus on Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics, to which I agree, is that the <math> tags in running text is discouraged because it can look rather ugly, and as far as I can see the original version was adequate. -- Jitse Niesen 10:43, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)

The Humungous Image Tagging Project

Hi. You've helped with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Wiki Syntax, so I thought it worth alerting you to the latest and greatest of Wikipedia fixing project, User:Yann/Untagged Images, which is seeking to put copyright tags on all of the untagged images. There are probably, oh, thirty thousand or so to do (he said, reaching into the air for a large figure). But hey: they're images ... you'll get to see lots of random pretty pictures. That must be better than looking for at at and the the, non? You know you'll love it. best wishes --Tagishsimon (talk)

Unverified images

Hi! Thanks for uploading the following images:

I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GNU Free Documentation License, {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know at my talk page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk, automation script)]] 22:31, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC)

P.S. You can help tag other images at User:Yann/Untagged_Images. Thanks again.

Unverified images

Hi! Thanks for uploading the following images:

I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GNU Free Documentation License, {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know at my talk page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk, automation script)]] 22:34, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC)

P.S. You can help tag other images at User:Yann/Untagged_Images. Thanks again.

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Image:Cichorium_pumilum.jpg

Hello, lorsh!

I'd like to congratulate you for the nice image of Chicory in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Cichorium_pumilum.jpg

It really makes Chicory a flower, not only a vegetable.

Also to to confirm it is Free Art and can be used in the chicory article of the Portuguese version of Wikipedia. Its license information is considered obsolete and so i'm not sure.

Best regards, --Hgfernan^Msg 07:04, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please use it. I fixed the license. Iorsh 13:03, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hebrew Wiki User?

Are you? Shnili 21:10, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK I found you there. Shnili 21:24, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Hi Iorsh! You are listed as a user from the Technion. Please note the ongoing vandalism User talk:132.68.1.29. --Super.zhid 13:35, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. A user from that IP has been vandalizing Balfouria as well as many other pages. nadav 11:21, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Plants

Hi! As a member of the WikiProject Plants you might be interested in supporting the nomination of Cactus for Article Improvement Drive. I honestly think that there is an underrepresentation of plants among featured articles. This is our chance! If you agree, you can support the nomination at theAID page. --Chino 07:20, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tetrahydrocannabinol.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Tetrahydrocannabinol.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:07, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Penicillin.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Penicillin.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:16, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mustard_gas.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mustard_gas.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:17, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tabun.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Tabun.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:17, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Israel-coa-medium.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Israel-coa-medium.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:40, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Rustaveli.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Rustaveli.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:19, 3 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:19, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Echinops adenocaulos.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Echinops adenocaulos.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:05, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is this image, and other simmilar ones you uploaded yours? If so please say so :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:05, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Cistus incanus.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Cistus incanus.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:35, 17 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:35, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Convolvulus dorycnium.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Convolvulus dorycnium.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:39, 8 May 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 (talk) 08:39, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Conyza bonariensis.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Conyza bonariensis.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:39, 8 May 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 (talk) 08:39, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Conyza bonariensis.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Conyza bonariensis.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:15, 10 May 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 (talk) 00:15, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One more image

Would you mind taking a look at Image:Conyza bonariensis.jpg? An editor has nominated it for deletion three times on grounds that you never said explicitly that it is your picture. If it is, could you please update the tag to match the other images you contributed in that time period? If not yours, let us know and we'll mark it for deletion. Thanks, Wikidemon (talk) 06:38, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Conyza bonariensis.jpg listed for deletion

per the above - one editor feels the image should be deleted because of some ambiguity over whether you are claiming to be the author of this image - Wikidemon (talk) 21:24, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Conyza bonariensis.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jay32183 (talk) 21:02, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vieta

Something new about Vieta Franciscus on my page : i have translated my 'owm' page of WP fr in english. you can see it here : User:Jean_de_Parthenay/Viete2/wikipedia

As my english is not native, i am scattered with the idea to publish it. if you are not agree, say it ! If you want to make change, do it ! If you don't say anything, i shall publish it through a week. Thanks.

And please, after that, it will be a first class article, with great importance ! isn't he ?Jean de Parthenay (talk) 06:23, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Helichrysum sanguineum.jpg

File:Helichrysum sanguineum.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Helichrysum sanguineum.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Helichrysum sanguineum.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:26, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tetracycline.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tetracycline.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JaGa^talk 21:03, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Something for you

		WikiProject Plants
		This botany barnstar is offered in profound gratitude for over 5 years of contributing to plants. Your first edit on the project was on sep 6, 2004 PS. I am delighted that you still occasionally find time to contribute to plant articles! TeunSpaans (talk) 06:13, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Science lovers wanted!

Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the Smithsonian Institution Archives until June! One of my goals as resident, is to work with Wikipedians and staff to improve content on Wikipedia about people who have collections held in the Archives - most of these are scientists who held roles within the Smithsonian and/or federal government. I thought you might like to participate since you are interested in the sciences! Sign up to participate here and dive into articles needing expansion and creation on our to-do list. Feel free to make a request for images or materials at the request page, and of course, if you share your successes at the outcomes page you will receive the SIA barnstar! Thanks for your interest, and I look forward to your participation! Sarah (talk) 20:04, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Iorsh. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article on Well Solitaire is unverified and not notable

If I'm not mistaken you created the page Well (solitaire). Can you make an argument for retaining this page rather than deleting? It's just a variant of Beleaguered City, and I can find zero reference to it anywhere. I have extensive experience with solitaire games, and the only solitaire game I've ever come across and can find with the same title is a variant of Four Seasons Solitaire, and is completely unrelated.

This seems to fail all the requirements for inclusion on Wikipedia, and is not notable or verifiable. If this conclusion is incorrect, please supply evidence otherwise. Gregorytopov (talk) 06:25, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Well (solitaire) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Well (solitaire), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Well (solitaire) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]