Talk:Neuropeptide

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Neuropeptide article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Neuroscience High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biology Mid‑importance

	Biology portal Neuropeptide is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Molecular Biology: MCB

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as High-importance).

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pharmacology High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was expanded as part of Project Tiger 2018.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Neuropeptide.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Untitled

Coexist List The Biohemical Basis of Neuropharmacology Oxford Press 1996--McDogm 16:16, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Candace Pert

The section about Candace Pert and how thoughts that are "loving and empowering" can boost the immune system seems awefully subjective and a little unscientific. Unless a reference for solid empirical evidence to support these statements exists, I think that this bit should be removed Owz182 - 4th May 2008 17:16 GMT —Preceding unsigned comment added by Owz182 (talk • contribs) 16:16, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My thoughts were the same when reading this: the claim is vague as well as unsupported (and the first claim that needs support is that Candace Pert coined the word) and its relevance not clear at this early stage in the article: I wouldn't have thought the opening couple of paras about neuropeptides is the place for what is no doubt a quite complex theory about the action of neuropeptides and the insight they offer into the mind-body question. Of course, if it is true that Candace Pert coined the word specifically to express this theory that would make things different, but it would still need reformulation and support. Mjmcm (talk) 06:40, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think Candace Pert coined the term, David de Wied is probably a better suggestion: http://www.umcutrecht.nl/subsite/Rudolf_Magnus_Institute/About_the_Institute/History_Institute_/David_De_Wied.htm, I suggest that the section mentioning C. Pert is removed. --jengeldk (talk) 14:29, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removed Candace pert section, as discussed above. Provide reasons/evidence if you believe it needs to be in the article. Cheers, willv. 10:15, 26 August 2008

Examples

under 5HT the neuropeptide TRH is not linked although a wiki page does exist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.101.95.33 (talk) 09:47, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

vs Peptide hormones

This page nicely explains the difference between neuropeptides and peptide hormones, and then ignores the distinction by indistinguishably referencing members of both classes.

173.25.54.191 (talk) 05:13, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They're not necessarily a dichotomy. Neurotransmitters and neuropeptides can be hormones, like dopamine and ghrelin respectively. Ghrelin is both a neuropeptide and a (peptide) hormone. The combined topic/field of study is neuroendocrinology though neuroendocrine cell is more relevant to this particular case. Seppi333 (Insert 2¢ | Maintained) 07:36, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

The Neuropeptide Functions have been further elaborated.Physiological Effects of each is tried to be explained briefly. Pushpa Ramakrishnan (talk) 06:39, 23 April 2018 (UTC)Pushpa Ramakrishnan[reply]