Talk:Manchester Monarchs (AHL)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles

United States: New Hampshire Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	New Hampshire portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire (assessed as Mid-importance).

appearance

On my browser, at least, the year-by-year record overlaps the infobox so that it's partly unreadable - that's why I moved it, before somebody moved it back. Their undo also returned duplicate material (e.g., the arena is listed twice, as are the colors, and the logo is described when it's shown right there). Standardization is good, but not if it makes an article unreadable and/or badly organized. - DavidWBrooks 17:56, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What browser/version? ccwaters 18:42, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Firefox 1.5.0.1 - DavidWBrooks 19:44, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I'm running (specifically Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060209 Debian/1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.1-2 Firefox/1.5.0.1). I'm not seeing any issue. I typically run at 1920x1200, but I just looked at it 1024x768 and 800x600. ccwaters 19:55, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

??? That's odd ... the infobox descends further than the text, right? What happens with your brower with the year-by-year pseudo-box at that point - does it get pushed down below the infobox, leaving white space below the text, or does it squish in to the left of the infobox? - DavidWBrooks 20:53, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, only reversed it because there's a set format/template for the NHL/AHL pages, and they're all supposed to be identical. I don't disagree with your edit, and the repetition of info is useless, but in Wikiproject Ice Hockey people are working hard to maintain consistency in the hockey pages. That's the ONLY reason the edit was reversed.Saradanger 03:37, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Team Logo

The team logo is now all black white and grey like the LA Kings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.2.246.31 (talk) 11:03, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Manchester Monarchs (AHL). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150418012224/http://theahl.com/monarchs-o-neill-voted-ahl-mvp-p197471 to http://theahl.com/monarchs-o-neill-voted-ahl-mvp-p197471

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:30, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]