Talk:Aphrodisias

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greece Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities Start‑class

	Cities portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Untitled

The information given here might be out-of-date as visits and books date back to 1992

Merge Stauropolis -> Aphrodisias

All in favour of this, since the names refer to the same city, and in fact co-existed for a while. The extra information in the Stauropolis entry will enrich the Aphrodisias article. (Stauropolis alone, without the historical data added by Aphrodisias, is very weak.)

What's the proceedure for making this decision? I'm happy to make the changes.

Gabrielbodard 13:17, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links

Who's the WikiWanker who redacted material in the 'External Links' thus

If these items do not belong in the bibliography, they probably do not belong in the article

Monuments of Aphrodisias, summarised by Turizm.net, a Turkish travel guide
History of Aphrodisias, birth place of the goddess of love
Virtual Tours of Aphrodisias

and why haven't they explained in more detail here? It's very discourteous.

Not my quarrel and I didn't provide those links but there's no reason to think otherwise but that someone originally thought them useful in good faith.

God damn these imbecile WikiPig cunts and their infantile anal retentive redactions and so help me I will restore a while hence if I don't see a satisfactory explanation. 81.178.38.169 (talk) 03:44, 21 November 2010 (UTC) (was user Rinpoche)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aphrodisias. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080709045224/http://www.oxbowbooks.com/bookinfo.cfm/ID/6582 to http://www.oxbowbooks.com/bookinfo.cfm/ID/6582/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:57, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Aphrodisias. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.geocities.com/lisa_brody/diss.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050208014533/http://www.armory.com:80/~turkiye/turkey/ege/aphrodisias/aphrodisiashist.html to http://www.armory.com/~turkiye/turkey/ege/aphrodisias/aphrodisiashist.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:25, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]