Talk:Generation loss
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
A discussion of film would be great
[edit]There needs to be a subcategory of the analog section discussing generation loss in film. At what point is generation loss considered significant when you make a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy of some movie film? 100 generations? 5? Tempshill (talk) 16:39, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Attribution
[edit]A reference was added, having been appropriated from the article Alvin Lucier. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:54, 29 September 2016 (UTC)