Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beach bum

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - kept - SimonP 02:47, May 14, 2005 (UTC)

Beach bum

At the very least needs a vast cleanup. More likely, it needs transwiki'ing. Grutness|^hello? 07:42, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and expand. Samaritan 17:36, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, unless someone tells me it's not a real subculture. Kappa 18:09, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without prejudice to a real article. Current content is worthless, and not a valid seed. —Korath (Talk) 01:49, May 9, 2005 (UTC)
Delete per Korath. R adiant _* 09:35, May 10, 2005 (UTC)

Keep. No idea about it, but has high google rate (31,000 on "Beach bum" culture). Serious expanding needed. --Marianocecowski 10:31, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No content to save by cleanup. No different from deleting it and starting a new article. - Tεx τ urε 15:50, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep.

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.