Talk:St Bartholomew's School

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Berkshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Berkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BerkshireWikipedia:WikiProject BerkshireTemplate:WikiProject BerkshireBerkshire articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Schools Mid‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Education in the United Kingdom (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education in the United Kingdom, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Education in the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Education in the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Education in the United KingdomEducation in the United Kingdom articles

POV

2nd or 3rd Oldest

I think the claim about being the second oldest stems from the fact that previously Eton was in Buckinghamshire, so it would have been the second oldest after Reading School, and then third oldest once the boundaries were changed -- Joolz 20:05, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps when Eton College joined Berkshire, Abingdon School left Berkshire? So, maybe SBS was still the third oldest? Ian Cairns 23:50, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tone

This whole article is full of opinion and even advertising. It needs a good re-write.Stormx2 23:46, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Much of this article seems to have been lifted from the school's website [1] - this is almost certainly a copyvio and needs investigation. Ian Cairns 06:40, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'm setting about reorganising/re-writing this. Please do re-edit as much as possible, it will be better than the original but not perfect... 87.240.137.127 22:22, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've been through the whole article, removing repeats and trying to make it more human. It should have no advertising in it at all anymore. CR7 22:51, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re-Organised

Done. It still needs links added and stuff, and I can't be bothered right now as its midnight.

teachers names

removed. this is badly written with many spelling mistakes, of no significance whatsoever, not to mention invitation for personal slurrs.

If any of the teachers become national heros, get a wikipedia article for a valid wikipedia approved reason, they you can include them.

For the moment the only relevant names are that of the head, SJR and potentially the deputy heads. Plus those of famous alumni

please do not put back in.

No mention of...

The fact that the school was a boys' Grammar School before it became a co-ed comprehensive! The Queen's visit in 1972 to commemorate the quincentenary in 1966 (a bit late!).

Also, despite the rewrite, the article reads more like a description of the present day school in a prospectus. It needs to include a bit more history and be rewritten to de-emphasise the current state of the school.

Sangwine 21:18, 12 November 2006 (UTC) (an old boy 1968-1975, but *not* an old Newburian)[reply]

Not sure about that. Present day informatin is as relevent as any history. 87.240.137.127 22:49, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Queen's visit (2)

The Queen also came to visit the school in the early 1990s. There should be mention of that?

Mid-90s in fact; can't recall the exact year, but must've been about 94/95....

It was earlier than 1994/5 because I started St Bart's in 1993 and the Queen visited sometime during the school year of 1992/3. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.157.31.129 (talk) 10:18, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rebuilding...er...what?

I'm a former student. What on earth CAN they rebuild when most of the buildings are probably listed and gorgeous, and the eyesore/LLC was finished the year before I left...I'm confused. Please tell me they're not going to knock down Wormestall Main Building T_T. Lady BlahDeBlah 05:51, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No Wormstall and the main luker building are both listed.

They still dont know what to do, they have.nt made up their minds yet.

St Barts has now been rebuilt, Wormstall is currently being converted into flats as it is a listed building. The main Luker building is being kept, as again it is listed, but the rest has been knocked down. The new school opened October last year (2010) with it being "officially" opened by Sophie Countess of Wessex March 2011. The new school is "eco" friendly and built in a star or flower shape with a central "hub" area in the centre. Despite being newly built there has been many problems with new building ranging from uneven paving slabs to toilets not being plumbed in to staff being advised not to drink tap water due to risk of legionnaires disease. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.222.209.27 (talk) 20:47, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assess

One of the elite schools to get a B. Well done! The article would benefit from a more comprehensive prose-style history section. Some of the trivia could be trimmed. Tell us more about the interesting things like the polo, and Eton Fives. Dahliarose 13:57, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

St Bart's (Boys) House Names

I was at St Bart's from 1954 to 1959 and a member of Evers House. My house master (and also my 1A form master) was Cecil Maggs, an ex-pupil. He had been a member of New House that was disbanded due to the sudden decrease in numbers in that house. The boys were moved to the other four houses. I think this was probably in the late '20s or early '30s. R Allen 156.61.43.239 (talk) 11:47, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on St Bartholomew's School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160617053310/http://www.debretts.com/people-of-today/profile/96263/Sue-HAYMAN to http://www.debretts.com/people-of-today/profile/96263/Sue-HAYMAN

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:12, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Narrative history

The addition of a narrative history by User:Alapper (in August 2020, following a minor edit war with User:HickoryOughtShirt?4) contains large amounts of unreferenced material, and depends on one source.

This section is informative, but may be too long to be useful in the context of this article.

As of October 2020, the article contains both the bullet point history and the long narrative history (in a separate sub section). Mxtt.prior (talk) 22:07, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]