Talk:Global Consciousness Project

The article Roger D. Nelson was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 13 September 2024 with a consensus to merge the content into Global Consciousness Project. If you find that such action has not been taken promptly, please consider assisting in the merger instead of re-nominating the article for deletion. To discuss the merger, please use this talk page.

Do not remove this template after completing the merger. A bot will replace it with {{afd-merged-from}}.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Global Consciousness Project article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Paranormal

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

1, 2, 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by .

Sources

Bragg, Roy (18 January 2005). "Flouting probability: Global Consciousness Project is out to measure something - if researchers can figure out what it might be". San-Antonio Express. Retrieved 2009-09-18.
Jurgensen, John (13 August 2004). "NUMBERS GAMES ; CAN SMALL DATA-GATHERING DEVICES INSTALLED AROUND THE WORLD QUANTIFY GLOBAL CONSCIOUSNESS DURING EVENTS LIKE THE OLYMPICS?". Hartford Courant. Retrieved 2009-09-18.
"Global Consciousness Project Index". Dashboard Widgets. Apple Inc. 31 May 2005. Retrieved 2009-09-18.
Berman, A.S. (6 December 2001). "Did Sept. 11 events refocus global consciousness?". USA Today. Retrieved 2009-09-18.
Kizilos, Katherine (28 April 2007). "Mind Over Matter". The Age. Retrieved 2009-09-18.
Garofoli, Joe (19 November 2006). "Anti-war couple conceive new way to generate peace". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 2009-09-18.
Matthews, Robert (9 February 2009). "Does mind affect matter". The Nation. Retrieved 2009-09-18.
Strauss, Stephen (8 March 2005). "Bouncing to a higher consciousness". CBC News Viewpoint. cbc.ca. Retrieved 2009-09-18.
Shamah, David (23 December 2008). "Digital World: I have seen the future,and it's on the Web". Jerusalem Post. Retrieved 2009-09-18.
Lucas, Jessica (20 April 2006). "Project gauges impact of global news". Daily Princetonian. Retrieved 2009-09-18.
Reed, J.D. (9 March 2003). "So Just What Makes the Earth Move?". New York Times. Retrieved 2009-09-18.
Chang, Kenneth (11 November 2003). "Do Paranormal Phenomena Exist?". New York Times. Retrieved 2009-09-18.
Pilkington, Mark (24 July 2003). "The Global Mind". The Guardian. Retrieved 2009-09-18.
Mullis, Kary B. (8 December 2006). "25 Greatest Science Books Introduction". Discover Magazine. Retrieved 2009-09-18.
Tsakiris, Alex. "Skeptoid's Brian Dunning Finds Global Consciousness Project Lacking". Skeptiko. Retrieved 2009-09-18.
"Dr. Dean Radin And Dr. Roger Nelson Respond to Global Consciousness Project Criticisms". Skeptiko. Retrieved 2009-09-18.
Park, Robert L. (2008). "Schrödinger's Grave". Superstition: Belief in the Age of Science. Princeton University Press. p. 215. ISBN 0691133557.
Dunning, Brian (10 June 2007). "Unconscious Research of Global Consciousness". Skeptoid. Retrieved 2009-09-18.

Additional sources

The day the world got smaller by Claudia Smith Brinson (Page 2) - The State
Far out: The Global Mind by Mark Pilkington - The Guardian
When all earth grieves: Science finds astonishing consequences of our pain by Sarah Gibb - The Vancouver Sun
Shared tragedies breeding global consciousness: study - The StarPhoenix
Roger Nelson’s “Global Consciousness” Does Not Exist by Dominique J. Persoons - European Journal of Theology and Philosophy

Calibration

How did they calibrated these devices? I mean, when designing a receiver for some signal, it is necessary to first measure its output in a signal-free environment, and then measure its output step by step, gradually increasing the signal. How did they do that? Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 11:11, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This type of analysis and discussion is precisely what is needed to support this article. Secondary sources commenting on the experiments are appropriate sources not the primary source of the studies themselves. - - MrBill3 (talk) 18:52, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Tags

Removing the following tags upon review:

This article needs additional citations for verification. (September 2009)

-Seems to be plenty now.

This article relies on references to primary sources. (September 2009)

- Seems a good mix now.

The neutrality of this article is disputed. (March 2012)

- I consider myself neutral on this topic and upon reading I feel there is fair weight for both sides.

If you wish to add any of these tags back please explain here first, I have the page watched and will be happy to respond.

Sulfurboy (talk) 18:17, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have added inline tags to illustrate where the article extensively relies on primary sources. See Wikipedia:PSTS#Primary.2C_secondary_and_tertiary_sources where it is clearly explained that single study is a primary source for itself. Other studies providing replication, meta analyses or published analyses are the needed appropriate secondary sources for much of the material in this article. Basic descriptions of GCP can be sourced to themselves but details of studies need to be reported on by secondary sources.

In addition most of the material is self published, some refer to journals but the link provided is not to the journal but the GCP website. If these articles were published full citations for the journals are needed (volume, issue, date, page number). Some of the critical material seems to be self published material also. I have tagged that too.

What is needed is for this article to rely primarily on secondary sources that have found the GCP notable enough to produce detailed discussion of its activities. - - MrBill3 (talk) 18:49, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Global Consciousness Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:15, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pareidolia or Apophenia?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareidolia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apophenia

Which best describes this phenomenon, pareidolia or apophenia? I think the latter.

Hpfeil (talk) 18:22, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please excuse my saying that I can't see how either can apply. This is an experiment carried out by scientific methods. By the way, I'm enjoying a book by Craig Weller called Psi Wars that throws an interesting light on what is happening here. --Brian Josephson (talk) 19:32, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Meaning of REG not explained

Random Number Generator, RNG? I don't get it. 93.241.211.7 (talk) 07:16, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It means Random Event Generator, but you are right - that isn't stated anywhere in the article. I'll add it in now NoSlacking (talk) 05:30, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]