User talk:Nickpelling

William Romaine Newbold and John Matthews Manly

Develop the pages as you wish. I come to the Voynich Manuscript and those associated with it from the historical angle. Jackiespeel (talk) 22:36, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Voynich Manuscript and Alphabetum Kaldeorum

Could there be a link between the two at least as conceptual ideas? (The authors of the VM being familiar with 'fancy cipher scripts' just develop one of their own.) Jackiespeel (talk) 12:55, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dandy

Hi there; odd question. Ages ago you were given the thankless task of converting Dandy to the Commodore C64 with only a few weeks to spare. The chaps at C64Endings have been long flummoxed by the game's ending - it has a riddle that the player is supposed to work out, but the riddle makes no sense and the game appears to have never had a proper ending on any format. Do you recall if there was one? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 14:23, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me what the riddle is? I don't recall putting a riddle in Dandy, but I should have a reasonably good chance of working it out. :-) Nickpelling (talk) 19:02, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for False writing system

You have listed the reasons for your proposed merge of this article with Asemic writing on Talk:False writing system. When you propose a merge of article X into article Y, you should list your rationale on the talk page of Y. Therefore, next time you should list your reasons for the proposed merge between two articles on the talk page of the article you want an article to merge with. Anyway, I endorse this merger. Tseung Kwan O Let's talk 01:39, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Books WikiProject

Hi Nickpelling,

I saw your work on articles related to writing and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch the WikiProject Books talk page, which is a noticeboard for Wikipedia's book coverage. It's a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to books. Take a look for yourself!

And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider adopting a cleanup category or participating in one of our current formal discussions.

Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around! czar 00:43, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Nickpelling/Voynich manuscript theories

A tag has been placed on User:Nickpelling/Voynich manuscript theories requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 18:57, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]