Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/4th Grade (South Park)

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:58, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

4th Grade (South Park)

Hopelessly unencyclopedic. Might be able to merge some of this into an article on a specific episode... --Barfooz (talk) 04:45, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Keep It was an episode of South Park, and its in an established Wikipedia Category. The article just needs to be cleaned up a little, which I'll start on once its decided to keep or delete. Conradrock 05:34, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - I just refurbished the article. It was apparently intended to be an episode summary for South Park so that's what I turned it into. Many of the show's episodes have individual articles. There's even a navigation template between them. I've added content, added the template, and a stub notice as more could be added. I think it's now a keeper.Tobycat 05:36, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep because someone seems to be going to the pointless trouble of writing articles on all SP episodes. A colossal waste of time, IMHO, but now it's done it would be silly to have a gap. --Angr/_{tɔk tə mi} 06:16, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as many TV shows have episodic articles. It may be a waste of time, but we'd have to take back possibly hundreds of articles. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 06:37, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, per Toby. Mgm|^(talk) 10:15, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - I actually know someone who referenced a Wikipedia article on South Park in a paper for a law class. -- BD2412 ^talk 13:19, 2005 Jun 6 (UTC)
  • And what grade were they in? sjorford →•← 13:58, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Third year law student, I kid you not - the reference was quite tongue-in-cheek. -- BD2412 ^talk 15:06, 2005 Jun 6 (UTC)
• Keep--thanks, Toby. Meelar (talk) 13:51, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, but inappropriate as a main article. A good example of why the mainspace should allow encyclopedic subpages. Keith D. Tyler ¶ [AMA] 17:20, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
  • Perhaps we could just make a tag to say "this isn't a main article"? Kappa 22:16, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.