Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Helicobacter pylori

Helicobacter pylori

Captivating pictures, interesting article. Chadloder 21:54, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)

• Support. However, a brief glance at this page shows that the popularity of the subject counts more than the thoroughness and quality of its treatment. Wetman 22:01, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Support, although I agree, the Popularity is very much in question.--Gamingboy 22:27, Sep 17, 2004 (UTC)
• Support. Cag pathogenicity island? cagA? Tell us what they are, and I'll support. Markalexander100 05:19, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Support. James F. (talk) 16:19, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Support. Regrettably, I can't tell you if the facts are correct or not, but the writing style is pretty good and the pictures are certainly interesting. - Ta bu shi da yu 14:27, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Support. Useless fact for the day acquired. Zerbey 17:19, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Support: this is an encyclopadia, not Pop Stars and this is a really good article. Filiocht 09:01, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Support. A little short, but a good article. Gentgeen 23:08, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Support. I even like its brevity. +sj+ 20:30, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)