Talk:American Contract Bridge League

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Contract bridge, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Contract bridge on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Contract bridgeWikipedia:WikiProject Contract bridgeTemplate:WikiProject Contract bridgeContract bridge articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Mississippi Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Mississippi portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mississippi (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Archives

1

USBF

When I was an active bridge player, I don't remember there being a United States Bridge Federation. The relationship among ACBL, USBF, and the World Bridge Federation, in terms of how teams from North America qualify for the Bermuda Bowl, should be explained by someone whose knowledge is more current than mine. JamesMLane 11:41, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Non-profit or not-for-profit

Our article on this type of entity is at Non-profit organization. Is there a reason to use the term "non-profit", which merely redirects there? JamesMLane t c 19:19, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed archiving

Archiving of talk-page threads is useful, even necessary, for talk pages that are very active. Otherwise, the page length becomes unwieldy. This page, however, sees little activity. I see no reason for archiving. It's true that the above comments have stood for four years and two years without response, but so what? Someone may come to this lightly trafficked article and have something useful to add on one of these points. As long as there's no issue of talk-page clutter, I believe they should remain.

I'm reverting the archiving of those two comments and the installation of automatic archiving. This is without prejudice to revisiting the subject when and if the talk page becomes suddenly active. JamesMLane t c 21:36, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear item in major activities list

The last item in the major activities list (at the top of the page) is

Besides representing the interests of its members with the World Bridge Federation,

Just a sentence fragment. Also, there was some mention in a edit summary that the ACBL may not have a current relationship with the WBF. I'd correct this, but I'm not sure what the right correction would be. Thanks. ArglebargleIV (talk) 23:12, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]