User talk:Wulfson~enwiki

Welcome!

Hello, Wulfson~enwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Lst 27 19:23, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Reference list for the subject

42. Ugilec 141 and ugilec 121 or 21 constitute a concern for the environment by virtue of their ecotoxicity, persistence and potential to bioaccumulate.

42. Угилек-141 и угилек-121 или 21 создают проблемы для окружающей среды из-за своей экотоксичности, стойкости и потенциальной способностью к биоаккумулированию.

(d) Potential for long-range environmental transport:

d) способность к переносу в окружающей среде на большие расстояния:

(c) Environmental fate, including data and information on the chemical and physical properties of a chemical as well as its persistence and how they are linked to its environmental transport, transfer within and between environmental compartments, degradation and transformation to other chemicals.

с) экологическая "судьба", включая данные и информацию о химических и физических свойствах и стойкости химического вещества и о том, как они связаны с его переносом в окружающей среде, перемещением в пределах природных сред и между ними, деструкцией и превращением в другие химические вещества.

3. The Committee shall examine the proposal and apply the screening criteria specified in Annex D in a flexible and transparent way, taking all information provided into account in an integrative and balanced manner.

3. Комитет рассматривает предложение и использует критерии отбора, изложенные в приложении D, на основе гибкого и транспарентного подхода, комплексным и сбалансированным образом учитывая всю представленную информацию.

Factors to be promoted when considering alternatives or combinations of alternatives shall include the human health risks and environmental implications of such alternatives.

К числу факторов, которым должно уделяться особое внимание при рассмотрении альтернатив или комбинаций альтернатив, относятся риски для здоровья человека и экологические последствия, связанные с внедрением таких альтернатив.

Mindful of decision 19/13 C of 7 February 1997 of the Governing Council of the United Nations Environment Programme to initiate international action to protect human health and the environment through measures which will reduce and/or eliminate emissions and discharges of persistent organic pollutants,

принимая во внимание решение 19/13 С Совета управляющих Программы Организации Объединенных Наций по окружающей среде от 7 февраля 1997 года об инициировании международных действий по охране здоровья человека и окружающей среды, осуществляемых на основе мер, которые позволят сократить и/или ликвидировать выбросы и сбросы стойких органических загрязнителей,

1. The sixth meeting of the Task Force on the Health Aspects of Air Pollution, held in Bonn (Germany) from 22 to 23 May 2003, was attended by 21 experts. They represented 12 Parties to the Convention, the European Commission, the EMEP Meteorological Synthesizing Centre-West (MSC-W), the Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM) and the World Health Organization’s European Centre for Environment and Health in Bonn (WHO/ECEH). The Meeting focused on the assessment of the health impacts of particulate matter and ozone.

1. Шестое совещание Целевой группы по аспектам воздействия загрязнения воздуха на здоровье человека состоялось 22-23 мая 2003 года в Бонне (Германия). В нем принял участие 21 эксперт. Эти эксперты представляли 12 Сторон Конвенции, Европейскую комиссию, Метеорологический синтезирующий центр-Запад (МСЦ-З), ЕМЕП, Центр по разработке моделей для комплексной оценки (ЦМКО) и Европейский центр по охране окружающей среды и здоровья Всемирной организации здравоохранения (ЕЦООСЗ ВОЗ). Главное внимание в ходе совещания было уделено оценке воздействия твердых частиц и озона на здоровье человека.

The monitoring program of chemicals – for example, persistent toxic substances (PTS) can never achieve the full extent of the geographical resolution to cover all the parts of the world.

С помощью программы мониторинга химических веществ, например стойких токсичных веществ (СТВ), мы никогда не сможем добиться полного географического охвата в глобальном масштабе. .

User:Sfrandzi

Hi, your Russian user talk page appears to be protected from editing at the moment? I'll try re-posting this on that page later, if I don't get a response here.

The ban relates to the page Shusha. If you look at its history, you can see that Sfrandzi broke the three revert rule on this page. However, he also made a change exactly identical to that of User:217.10.38.105 - see the two diff between their changes: [1].

This edit of Sfrandzi's came almost immediately after the anonymous account was warned about the the three revert rule. All of this came to my attentiona the administrator's noticeboard. Looking at Sfrandzi's contributions, I noted that his was a very new account used only on a few similar pages, and one which shows immediate knowledge of how to edit wikipedia. Similarly, I noted that his contributions began at almost the same time as 217.10.38.105's and were on almost identical pages.

Based on all this, I thought it was reasonable to presume that the Sfrandzi account had been created for the purpose of disruptive sockpupettry, and deserved and indefinate ban. Clearly, if I hear evidence to the conterary, I'd be happy to at lest reconsider. --Robdurbar 09:03, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thank you for your response - I forgot that my talk page is semi-protected against unregs, and as you were not registered in RuWP, so you were not allowed to answer there.

Now I see your grounds for Sfrandzi's ban - but the thing is we are not that harsh in RuWP on this sort of thing (here, sock puppetry is mostly considered an offence when used in voting, etc.) and the Three-revert rule is actually not effective here - we did a translation of it into Russian last May yet preferred not to even put it to the vote, considering it irrelevant for our specific situation (adoption of this rule might, IMHO, result in edit wars on a wide scale, with lots of users on each side).

As a matter of fact, we almost never have to deal with it here, so maybe that was why Sfrandzi did not pay attention to the warnings he got - especially as they came from the user (if I am not mistaken) who is in conflict with Sfrandzi here in RuWP over the matter of Nagorno-Karabakh (Shusha, etc.) - Sfrandzi sticks to the pro-Armenian posture, and his opponent, to the pro-Azerbaijani one. I am well familiar with both of them, and even tried for some time to act as an intermediary between them.

I think that before I ask you to reconsider your action against Sfrandzi I had better talk to him first and see whether he is going to act in a more peaceful manner. As for myself, I do not actually consider him disruptive - though he surely is sometimes very biased - but very competent, I assure you. I guess we all may be biased sometimes - at least I can say as much for myself.

Anyway, thank you - and I hope we can have this matter settled.

Bye, Wulfson 19:49, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, Sfrandzi in RuWP is ru:Участник:Павел Шехтман - you are welcome to check his contribution. It's really not that bad. Of course, if you can read Russian :-) He made his first edits in enWP as an unreg - so actually all his offence amounted to registering himself. :-) Wulfson 19:56, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, well I'm happy so long as you're endorsing him, and there's no formalities needed. By the way, I might now ask you to return the favour in a way. I created an account at RuWp when you first contacted me, so I could respond on your talk page (which I figured was only semi-protected). Anyway, I just tried to edit there now, but my IP had been blocked with the message Auto-added for persistent vandalism; possible open proxy.

The IP is from the University of Durham, and shared by thousands of students. I don't know the full details of the ban or the pattern of vandalism, but you might consider looking into an unblock for that? I know we have quite a few Russian students here. --Robdurbar 00:21, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppets

Hi Wulfson. You are making a very successful career in ru_wikipedia, as I can see. And very nice progress with the "Wikipedia RU". So success on all fronts. FYI I asked Alex Bakharev's help in checking whose sockpuppets were those whom you attributed to me. As my personal IP guard, you certainly know that these sockpuppets have nothing to do with me. Nonetheless you claimed that they are mine. You are welcome to comment on that matter if want. SA ru (talk) 22:19, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Wulfson. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Wulfson~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

03:27, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

20:36, 22 April 2015 (UTC)