Jump to content

User talk:Modotcom

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Modotcom, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  — Instantnood 17:19, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)

HKWNB, HKCOTW, Current events

[edit]

Hi. I noticed you have edited some Hong Kong-related articles. You might be interested to take a look at HK wikipedians' notice board, HK Collaboration of the Week and Current events in Hong Kong and Macao. Happy editing! — Instantnood 17:19, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Apm entrance.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 01:47, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ngau Tau Kok

[edit]

I assume you know the division of election boundary is largerly based on the geographic distribution of population. It is often against common sense to a place. For example, part of Tsing Yi South division is on the reclamation of Stonecutter's Island, solely for administrative division. It is hard to tell why the north of Clear Water Bay Road is Wong Tai Sin District while south is Kwun Tong District except administrative one.

The proper Ngau Tau Kok is around the present-day corner of Kwun Tong Road. It is grow out of a village, then squatter and then public housing estate. In 1936 maps, Jordan Valley is marked as Tai Wan Tsuen, or Tai Wan closed to the shore, and a earlier map of 1932, there are several villages around Ngau Chi Wan. Both marked a distinction from Ngau Tau Kok. South coast of Jordan Valley is a natural extension of the town but not the north.

People usually refer the area around Ping Shek Estate as Ngau Chi Wan or Ping Shek. Up the Clear Water Bay Road and New Clear Water Bay Road is the same cluster of residential housing. It is not linked to Ngau Tau Kok in the community. With in Kwun Tong District, Shun Lee Estate is more closer to Sau Mau Ping.

For Jordan Valley, even on government map, it make the area distinctive from Ngau Tau Kok.

HenryLi (Talk) 02:43, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. As the article is unsourced, should there be any convincing evidents, it would be rather easy to settle. — HenryLi (Talk) 05:02, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image source problem with Image:DSC00884.JPG

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:DSC00884.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:54, 11 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 17:54, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Hkbu emblem.JPG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 14:38, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please attribute or claim media you uploaded or restored: File:Amoy-waiking.jpg

[edit]

You uploaded or restored , File:Amoy-waiking.jpg, but for various reasons did not add an {{information}} block, or indicate your (user) name on the file description page. Media uploaded to Wikipedia needs information on the SPECIFIC authorship and source of files, to ensure that it complies with copyright laws in various jurisdictions.

If it's entirely your own work:
please include {{own}} in the relevant source field, amend the {{information}} added by a third party, ensuring that your user name (or name you want used for attribution) is clear in the author field, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant (if such a license is not already used). You should also add an |author= parameter to the license tag, to assist reviews and image patrollers.

When you have copmpleted the above steps: to indicate that you've accepted the given the license shown, and updated the file description page appropriately.

If it's not entirely your own work, or the media is based on the work of others:
Please update the source and authorship fields, so that they accurately reflect the source and authors of the original work(s), as well as the derivative you created. You should also not use a "self" license unless the work is entirely you own. Media that is incorrectly claimed as self or {{own}}, will eventually be listed at Files for Discussion or deleted, unless it's full status is entirely clear to other contributors, reviewers and image patrollers. You should also read Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission which details how to confirm any permissions you obtained for works by others that are still in copyright.

Whilst this notification, relates to a single media upload, it would also be appreciated if you could ensure that appropriate attribution exists for other media you uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If media is not claimed, and there's no other obvious source or authorship information, the file may have to be removed for copyright reasons.

It's okay to remove or strike messages like this once the concerns have been addressed. :). ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:54, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Amoy-waiking.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Amoy-waiking.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]