Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Deep Narayan Mahaprabhuji
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was - kept
Unverified since September; age claim is likely false; oldest person who lived was 122 (see supercentenarian). Peter O. (Talk, automation script) 05:55, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Of course the age claim is bogus, but a wrong fact isn't reason to delete. Let it be eventually fixed. Dbenbenn 01:24, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. I had inserted the word "allegedly" before the age of 135 years in Oct. I now inserted the link longevity myths. Hope that is okay. Andries 06:32, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Dan100 10:27, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: Forget the longevity and the apotheosis: The article is almost entirely the teachings of. Without context, without a real establishment of the importance of the figure, this is proselytizing. If this spiritual leader was a worldwide leader, a sectarian, etc., then the article needs to establish that and then summarize the teaching rather than give us (and who are we supposed to be, disciples?) a list of the Way. Geogre 13:26, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Less than 300 hits. Hits give longer text to people like this than Gandhi? Notability not established. Noble? Maybe. Notable? Doesn't seem so. And yes, notability is a deletion criteria--see #17 Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#What_Wikipedia_articles_are_not. Niteowlneils 16:50, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, of course. Do not delete articles on significant religious figures. That's bordering on offensive. Everyking 17:31, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, but the PoV needs a serious haircut. Wyss 00:56, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- keep Yuckfoo 03:17, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Strong Delete. I am an Indian and I don't think this person needs a mention in Wikipedia. I would strongly recommend that other articles on swamis and yogis by User:Mansukram be deleted. Don't vote keep, simply because they are well-written or non-stub. Ask some Indians (Wikipedia:Indian wikipedians' notice board, Wikipedia:Wikipedians/India); they know that these yogis are not really notable. utcursch 12:05, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.