Jump to content

Talk:XXX Corps (United Kingdom)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wow. Following that link, I really didn't know what to expect. Dirtiest...name...ever. :) Meelar 04:13, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)

LOL! - actually they are Roman numerals. It actually means "Thirty Corps" (30 Corps) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.148.221.50 (talk) 10:31, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on XXX Corps (United Kingdom). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:11, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on XXX Corps (United Kingdom). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:29, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing and 'Order of Battle'

[edit]

I think there needs to be more referencing here. The technique seems to have been to write a paragraph, then provide a reference at the end of the paragraph. However, it is quite clear that the references don't cover all the (varied) information within the individual paragraph! Thus, for example, the para on Market Garden, ending with reference [39]. This paragraph begins, "By 21 September the Guards Armoured Division troops were exhausted, and Horrocks also took ill, with XXX Corps periodically being commanded by its Brigadier General Staff (BGS) Brigadier Harold Pyman, for which he would be made Chief of Staff of Second Army after the operation." I have a great deal of interest in Op Market Garden, but I have never read that Horrocks "took ill" [sic] and that Brig Pyman took charge. Where has this information come from? I'm genuinely interested as I had always wondered why Horrocks (a hard charger previously) did not impress the necessary sense of urgency on Guards Armd Div. So, what's the source of this vital piece of information? It's certainly not reference [39] which addresses "The 4th and 5th Battalions The Dorsetshire Regiment in World War Two". The next paragraph (last one in the section on Market Garden), tsarting "The failure of Gavin's 82nd Airborne Division to seize the Nijmegen bridge caused a long delay for the XXX Corps to arrive at the Arnhem bridge as planned" suffers similarly. The only reference provided ([40]) actually doesn't support the information given in that paragaph! I would also challenge the suggestion that Gavin's failure to take the bridge over the Wall was THE problem that slowed XXX Corps' progress to Arnhem. It was one of the problems, certainly, but there were others (including the Germans' destruction of the bridge at Zon which delayed the advance on day 1.) Moreover, suggesting that, in turn, it was THIS that caused 1 Airborne Div to withdraw from Oosterbeek is also somewhat simplistic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C7:8F81:B200:280C:2345:BC8F:F25B (talk) 15:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:XXX_Corps_(United_Kingdom)&oldid=1206100296"