Talk:Gwen Moore

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Wisconsin Mid‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Congress

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) person(s).

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Politics: American

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force.

Untitled

Family

Is it really appropriate to mention her son's arrest? I don't see how it relates to her career as a legislator. I wonder if a white man's son commited a minor crime: would that be included in an article? Just wondering! --24.184.16.201 18:03, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Unfortunately, lawmakers are public figures and that means their families are by association. This obviously is degrees of difference in terms of national spotlight, but Teresa Heinz-Kerry was never running for president, and yet her quirky personality became news as part of her husband's campaign. Same for the Bush twins. The information in the article is accurate and not overblown, so I think it would be difficult to make a case for its removal -- particularly since it was sort of a partisan attack. It's a reasonable question though. Maybe it could be balanced by some more information on her? Katefan0 19:23, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)

- OK. I will add more information about her family --Justy329 19:46, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

- I see that this discussion hasn't been updated in a while, but, inasmuch as I recently rewrote and reworked most of the article and appended info apropos of the resolution of the case of Rep. Moore's son, I suppose I ought to explain why I left the information concerning the criminal case in the article. Principally, I suppose, given that my edits were primarily to improve the syntax, tone, and grammar of the article, I didn't want them to be reverted because someone was not in accord with my having removed the material. Ancillarily, I think Katefan0, whose comment supra I hadn't seen when I reworked the article, is quite right. Surely we include information about the immediate families of politicians when members of those families make news—although surely I would hope we don't make untoward inferences about the politican him/herself—as we did, for example, with the Bush twins. As Katefan0 well notes, the tire-slashing here was alleged to have been partisan and to have been undertaken by the four persons accused of the crime at least in part in their official capacities as "operatives" (to use the term so en vogue w/respect to this case) either of the DNC or the Democratic Party of Wisconsin. Finally, it should be noted that during the pendency and at the resolution of the case, Rep. Moore issued comments with respect to the character of her son and her beliefs about the appropriate disposition of the case. My personal opinion is that, even though the Milwaukee County DA is a Democrat, like Rep. Moore and Mayor Pratt, whose son was also involved, were the tire slashings to have been indiscriminant vandalism or even volitionally political but connected neither to the Democratic Party nor to any Democratic politican, the case would never have received the publicity or strident prosection that it did. Nevertheless, it is a not insignificant note about the Congresswoman, and, so I think it belongs in the article, though I will surely welcome any views to the contrary. Joe 22:20, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

District Boundries?

Is any of West Allis in her district? I live in West Allis, but am in Sensenbrenner's District. I am going to remove West Allis.--67.53.88.202 03:33, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, a portion of West Allis is in the district; so I corrected the article to reflect that. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:31, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Gwen Moore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070929132046/http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=423968 to http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=423968

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:22, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Gwen Moore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gwen Moore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120915193510/http://www.csce.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContentRecords.ViewDetail&ContentRecord_id=145&ContentType=G&ContentRecordType=G&UserGroup_id=96&region_id=96&year=0&month=0&Subaction=PressReleases&CFID=5163160&CFTOKEN=65570212 to http://www.csce.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContentRecords.ViewDetail&ContentRecord_id=145&ContentType=G&ContentRecordType=G&UserGroup_id=96&region_id=96&year=0&month=0&Subaction=PressReleases&CFID=40853&CFTOKEN=78982147

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:26, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gwen Moore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20171022024104/https://cpc.grijalva.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=71&sectiontree=2,71 to https://cpc.grijalva.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=71&sectiontree=2,71

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:18, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways and Means

Moore is now on the Ways and Means Committee. 98.10.165.90 (talk) 16:18, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Article issues

The article has a multitude of "citation needed" tags. This is not a good thing for any article but a BLP should have better sourcing.

External links

Some things just grow by nature. The "External links" section, one of the optional appendices, has eight entries. Three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone has their favorite to add for four links.

The problem is that none is needed for article promotion.

ELpoints #3) states: Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
LINKFARM states: There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.
ELMIN: Minimize the number of links. --
ELCITE: (Not relevant here) Do not use {{cite web}} or other citation templates in the External links section. Citation templates are permitted in the Further reading section.
WP:ELBURDEN: Disputed links should be excluded by default unless and until there is a consensus to include them.

Some of the current links include ones that are not needed giving no benefit to the article, can be included in the article with sources, and should be trimmed accordingly. -- Otr500 (talk) 18:24, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]