User talk:ShardPhoenix
Notable StarCraft players
[edit]I have noticed that you have edited the information about the notable SC players and that's excellent! However, that particular information generally goes in another set of articles. Specifically, the StarCraft article should be focused on the game more than on the players and the story itself. Would you be willing to move that information to separate articles? You could create a list of notable StarCraft players and for those players that are notable enough create a separate article. For example, Lim Yohwan deserves his own article. Kudos, —Joseph | Talk 08:40, Dec 5, 2004 (UTC)
Good work
[edit]I like your sane, objective edits to the Starcraft articles. I am also working on SC article currently (see my userpage and the SC talk page). Your move to delete the story was a bold one but a necessary one: that text dump could never have sorted out. We need a short summary and we can expand on the story in Starcraft universe. Also, what about a seperate Multiplayer (StarCraft) article to put the notable players, tactics related text, etc... ? ... Phils 15:45, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Hi ShardPhoenix,
I want to work on this article and get it upto the standard it deserves. But I want it to be collaborative effort, one, because I would not know too much about the club history and other details, and secondly, because, well, its always more fun to work as a team! You seem to have worked on the article before, so would you like to join in? -Aabha (talk) 13:40, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
swamp man
[edit]if you're still interested in the thought experiment about which you commented, I've posted a reply on the talk page that I hope will be a little helpful.
- Ncsaint 21:31, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
Response to Starcraft article fork comment
[edit]Response at User_talk:Reaverdrop#Starcraft_article_fork - - Reaverdrop (talk/nl/w:s) 17:00, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Starcraft
[edit]Regarding your recent addition, would you please add a reference showing that that player you added is the most famous? Thanks Judgesurreal777 16:57, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Arbonne International
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Arbonne International, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Arbonne International. Argyriou (talk) 18:50, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
2010 F1 season
[edit]Thanks for fixing the vandalism. I've indeffed the racist. Mjroots (talk) 08:16, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, ShardPhoenix. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, ShardPhoenix. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, ShardPhoenix. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)