Talk:Piegan Blackfeet

	Montana portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montana, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Montana on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontanaWikipedia:WikiProject MontanaTemplate:WikiProject MontanaMontana articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Indigenous peoples of North America

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

Using edit summaries

The bit about two spirited doesn't seem to be really all that informative and rather out of snyc with everything else, Was that just thrown in as some random thought? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.211.236.86 (talk) 16:20, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It keeps getting edited back in as well, it seems like someone with a vested interest in denying male two-spirited individuals is vandalizing the page. The source is also dubious. ~\\--141.193.125.94 (talk) 23:21, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism is often identified as edits by IP users who don't use an edit summary. Use one every time to avoid being reverted when it appears to be a random deletion from an article with no explanation. Fettlemap (talk) 00:47, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 September 2020 and 18 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mlegood.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 06:38, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Foot vs Feet

Don't mix up the Blackfoot with the Blackfeet you dumbass. The tribe, which is described here is called Blackfoot. The Blackfeet-Indians are a subtribe of the Lakota. See also [[1]] 217.162.153.19 07:12, 16 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing that out. I'll see if I can weed out the mess. - Hephaestos 07:15, 16 Nov 2003 (UTC)

That's not really correct. There are two tribes, which are called Blackfeet. The one described in this Article are the Algonkin (sometimes also called Blackfoot). The other one is, as mentioned above, the Lakota tribe. --Napa 11:03, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)

The federal government has decided that the Blackfoot are officially the Blackfeet, which they also use as the plural. Hyacinth 09:24, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Blackfeet is preferred by the Blackfeet tribe. You should probably change the name of the other articles out of respect, regardless of whatever is official according to non-Blackfeet peoples. – ishwar (speak) 17:36, 2005 August 17 (UTC)

Things get a little more complicated when you consider that the Blackfeet in the United States prefer Blackfeet, while the Canadian part of the tribe prefers Blackfoot. By the same token, the Americans prefer the spelling Piegan while the Canadians use Peigan (both derived from Pikuni or Piikuni). Yamamoto333

That, by now, is all nicely explained in the article, but further down, the article keeps using "Blackfoot" and "Blackfeet" interchangeably. Having once given the explanation, shouldn't we stick to one or the other within the article? Comparable, for instance, to using either British English or American English spelling within one article, but not switching back and forth all the time? --93.212.252.179 (talk) 07:07, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Walter McClintock Lantern Slides

The historic photographs at Commons of the Category:Walter_McClintock_Lantern_Slides are described both as Blackfeet and Siksika Nation, from Montana. Someone familiar with the history could probably determine how to categorize them correctly. Also, many photographs appear to be from the Glacier National Park area. Someone familiar with the park could probably identify the mountains and lakes. If all this land was Blackfoot or Siksika Nation land at the time, should all the photos get those tags? Djembayz (talk) 17:57, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Black feet" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Black feet. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 17#Black feet until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:25, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]