Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shakespeare Discussion Groups
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 17:15, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a collection of links. RickK 06:33, May 14, 2005 (UTC)
- Merge, with Shakespeare. EvilPhoenix
- Delete. Do not merge, these aren't particularly useful links. Gamaliel 07:47, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I agree. El_C 08:15, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, wikipedia isn't a web directory. --W(t) 14:28, 2005 May 14 (UTC)
- Merge. Shakespeare fans can remove if not useful. DoubleBlue (Talk) 14:32, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, Wikipedia is not dmoz. ✏ OvenFresh² 16:15, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A mere list of links. Merge as we use the term here means including cut-and-paste text moves, which then gives GFDL problems unless a redirect is kept to preserve the edit history, and this redir would be useless. If you find the links useful, add them to an appropriate article; They are information and don't give GFDL problems. Andrewa 17:54, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I have no idea what you just said. ??? DoubleBlue (Talk) 23:47, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Please see User talk:DoubleBlue#Welcome. Andrewa 12:43, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I have no idea what you just said. ??? DoubleBlue (Talk) 23:47, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, wikipedia is not a web directory. Megan1967 04:03, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, as stated above.--Sophitus 20:39, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.