Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thirty feet up

Thirty feet up was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to delete.

I can't find the poem on google. Seems original research at best. Should I've made this a speedy on the basis of nonsense? Sander123 10:24, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)

• No, but perhaps as a self-admitted vanity. Delete. Gazpacho 11:23, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete as vanity. AtonX 11:58, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Autobiographical and no evidence it's encyclopedic. Andrewa 12:24, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete it until the author becomes notable. *cough* - Vague | Rant 12:54, Nov 18, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete: Obvious vanity. Fortunately, we are not a writing website. Geogre 15:05, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity, original research. (The title reminds me of the Sherman and Sherman song "Ten Feet Off the Ground.") [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 20:51, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Basically nothing more than a self-admitted and blatant vanity article. [[User:Mo0|Mo0[talk]]] 21:18, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• My crystal ball says delete. [[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 05:20, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. DCEdwards1966 03:29, Nov 20, 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.