User talk:Litefantastic

This editor has decided to leave Wikipedia.

You helped choose Pluto as this week's WP:AID winner

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Pluto was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

Davodd 20:06, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Floppy disk

Floppy disk is up for a featured article review. Detailed concerns may be found here. Please leave your comments and help us address and maintain this article's featured quality. Sandy (Talk) 22:14, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TFD nomination of Template:Editwar

I see the note saying you've left, so you probably don't care anyway; but... Template:Editwar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)} 21:35, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of fictional people who were cremated

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article List of fictional people who were cremated, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:List of fictional people who were cremated. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. VegaDark 11:23, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the message you left on my page, I didn't (and still don't) see a message at the top of this page requesting that people not post on your talk page. I see the "This user has left Wikipedia" box, I was unaware that meant I shouldn't write on your talk page. I thought I would do you the courtesy of notifying you about the deletion (as per proper prod procedure), I'm sorry if that caused you distress. I'll be sure not to post here again after this if that's what you want. VegaDark 06:29, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Items and concepts in FLCL

I'm not sure if you'll come back and read this, or if you'll care, but I added the "{{unreferenced}}" and "{{mergeto}}" templates to the article. You have a lot of passion for the subject, so rather than simply propose it for deletion I wanted to let you know, so you could possibly help bring it up to Wikipedia's standards. I'm looking for help, not trying to rub it in your face. Thanks. Leebo86 16:49, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:L-record.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:L-record.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:23, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Combubble speech offscreen.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Combubble speech offscreen.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:24, 11 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Lokal _Profil 22:24, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Flcl-2.jpg

Hello, Litefantastic. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Flcl-2.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Litefantastic/Test. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:11, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Mullerfokker-cover.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mullerfokker-cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 19:22, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:051011 lost hmed5p.hmedium.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:051011 lost hmed5p.hmedium.jpg. However, the image is missing a fair use rationale. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair-use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 19:36, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of 'Round the World with the Rubber Duck

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on 'Round the World with the Rubber Duck, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because 'Round the World with the Rubber Duck seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting 'Round the World with the Rubber Duck, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 01:02, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Bitterman

An article that you have been involved in editing, Bitterman, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitterman. Thank you. Cheers,Je t Lover (Report a mistake) 02:53, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Rincewind

Rincewind, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Rincewind satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rincewind and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Rincewind during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Pilotbob 05:51, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of fictional United States Presidents

List of fictional United States Presidents, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that List of fictional United States Presidents satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional United States Presidents (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of List of fictional United States Presidents during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 02:28, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mullerfokker-cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mullerfokker-cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:KOP.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:KOP.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shōki (InuYasha)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Shōki (InuYasha), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Shōki (InuYasha). Nick Penguin_(contribs) 00:30, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FLCL-ep up for deletion

A template you created, Template:FLCL-ep, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the {{deprecated}} tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention. --Dino guy 1000 21:18, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:JI

A tag has been placed on Template:JI requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{tranclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:20, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Wdev logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Wdev logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 11:03, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

???

But? *sigh*

How sad...

♥ ♥ Blacky98 (talk) 15:29, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Revolving door.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Revolving door.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JaGa^talk 22:11, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Tabcan.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Tabcan.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:46, 5 January 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 19:46, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Kikyo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Kikyo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:03, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Combubble speech.PNG

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Combubble speech.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:16, 17 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:16, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grad hat jpg.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Grad hat jpg.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:20, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Grad_hat_jpg.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Grad_hat_jpg.gif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 07:42, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That was five years ago; my memory is fuzzy. If the evidence I supplied at the time is unconvincing, you'd probably do best to delete it. -Litefantastic (talk) 07:19, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wcdonalds.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wcdonalds.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:26, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Genchar

Template:Genchar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Axem Titanium (talk) 13:47, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ww1vet-7-2-2005.PNG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ww1vet-7-2-2005.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:33, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:FLCL

Template:FLCL has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. JJ98 (Talk) 02:47, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Project A-ko

Template:Project A-ko has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. JJ98 (Talk) 04:19, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cthulhu Mythos in popular culture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cthulhu Mythos in popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cthulhu Mythos in popular culture(3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 22:43, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Associated Shades

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Associated Shades requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mythpage88 (talk) 22:01, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tab2liter.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tab2liter.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 13:00, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of fictional works in mass media for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of fictional works in mass media is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional works in mass media until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Si Trew (talk) 20:26, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Francis Schonken/List of fictional rulers

User:Francis Schonken/List of fictional rulers, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Francis Schonken/List of fictional rulers and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Francis Schonken/List of fictional rulers during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:28, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Example of outdoor performance stage.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Example of outdoor performance stage.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:07, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fictional telecom protocols has been nominated for discussion

Category:Fictional telecom protocols, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. SJK (talk) 00:05, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Loomis.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Loomis.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Codename Lisa (talk) 12:14, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 19XX

The article 19XX has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An stub of OR on a concept (no references). No indication that this requires an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LukeSurl^{t c} 22:47, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of youth organizations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of youth organizations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of youth organizations until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saturnalia0 (talk) 16:09, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Political group listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Political group. Since you had some involvement with the Political group redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 05:53, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Grand Fenwick

The article Grand Fenwick has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 19:42, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Grand Fenwick for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grand Fenwick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Fenwick until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

EpicPupper (talk) 22:49, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]