Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Terragen
Appearance
A pretty good scene I designed in Terragen. Illustrates terragen and an number of other articles pretty well.
- Support. Self Nom. --Fir0002 08:30, May 23, 2005 (UTC)
- Support #2, the first image is too dark on the left. Mgm|(talk) 08:46, May 23, 2005 (UTC)
- Question: were these made with the registered version? If not, they violate the terms of use for Terragen. Fredrik | talk 09:38, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
- How so? And I quote "You are required to register your copy of Terragen if it is for commercial use... If you only intend to use Terragen personally, on a non-profit basis, registration is optional" --Fir0002 09:44, May 23, 2005 (UTC)
- These images are claimed to be licensed under the GFDL, which allows commercial use. Non-commercial-only images are no longer acceptable on Wikipedia and never were for featured pictures. Fredrik | talk 10:45, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
Oh gee I never thought of that. Good point. I was wondering if I could do the voting somehow, as I would like to test the quality of the images before submitting them to a competition.
- These images are claimed to be licensed under the GFDL, which allows commercial use. Non-commercial-only images are no longer acceptable on Wikipedia and never were for featured pictures. Fredrik | talk 10:45, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
- How so? And I quote "You are required to register your copy of Terragen if it is for commercial use... If you only intend to use Terragen personally, on a non-profit basis, registration is optional" --Fir0002 09:44, May 23, 2005 (UTC)
- How can this be seen as a "Non-commercial-only image"? Mgm|(talk) 16:46, May 23, 2005 (UTC)
How can you delete inappropriate images? --Fir0002 10:56, May 23, 2005 (UTC)- Images for deletion. Superm401 | Talk 21:15, May 23, 2005 (UTC)
- I guess Image:Arj-Terragen-SunsetOverMountainLake.jpeg is also inappropriately licensed? --Fir0002 11:29, May 23, 2005 (UTC)
- Probably, I'm afraid. I suppose you could ask for permission to GFDL these particular images, though. Fredrik | talk 15:58, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
*Oppose. Reasons above. Superm401 | Talk 21:13, May 23, 2005 (UTC)(deleting own original vote)
- I have been succesfull in asking for permission to release the photos under the GFDL. This should resolve the copyright problems. See the talk page for he's reply. --Fir0002 07:13, May 24, 2005 (UTC)
- That's great news. With that cleared, I'd like to express my support for either image. Terragen is an awesome program. Fredrik | talk 09:34, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
- That's a fact --Fir0002 10:08, May 24, 2005 (UTC)
- That's great news. With that cleared, I'd like to express my support for either image. Terragen is an awesome program. Fredrik | talk 09:34, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
- I have been succesfull in asking for permission to release the photos under the GFDL. This should resolve the copyright problems. See the talk page for he's reply. --Fir0002 07:13, May 24, 2005 (UTC)
- Support. I now support based on the now genuine GFDL status. Superm401 | Talk 03:31, May 26, 2005 (UTC)
- I wouldn't be enthusiastic about using it to illustrate articles about real geological pheonomena(i.e. deserts, mountains), however, for the record. Superm401 | Talk 03:34, May 26, 2005 (UTC)
- What put the notion that I'd do that into your head? --Fir0002 07:36, May 26, 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Spangineer (háblame) 12:43, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)
Promoted Image:Terragen render.jpg 5 / 0, apparent preference for second image --Spangineer (háblame) 12:43, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)