This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Warwickshire, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Warwickshire. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.WarwickshireWikipedia:WikiProject WarwickshireTemplate:WikiProject WarwickshireWikiProject Warwickshire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Some facts are in conflict -- thepeerage.com & 1911 Britannica both say he served as Lord Chamberlain for eight months, while Wikipedia says he served for a few years... that fact seems to be an error on our part. However, thepeerage.com also states that he served as North Secretary twice, and South Secretary at different intervals than are indicated on the lists here... ugen64 16:43, Aug 28, 2004 (UTC)
I derived the list of secretaries of state from the Handbook of British Chronology, which is not infallible... johnk 00:17, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Looking at thepeerage.com's version, that looks to be likely right - usually the junior secretary of state had the northern office, and the more senior one the southern, so Sunderland oughtn't have gone directly to the southern office in 1684. (The first time this was ignored was, I believe, in 1706, when Harley, the senior secretary, remained at the northern office following the resignation of Hedges as Southern Secretary). johnk 00:22, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)