Jump to content

Talk:Apiaceae

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Names

[edit]

this article as I found it equated Apiaceae with umbelliferae.

however, umbelliferae redirects to the parent of THIS family, which is Apiales! -- Tarquin 16:31 Feb 27, 2003 (UTC)

Good catch. It's actually Apiaceae. I'll fix it. Rei

But when did this name change happened? 15 - 20 years ago when I learned about them, I learned about umbelliferae so it was a surprise for me to find that they are now called apiaceae.89.137.187.148 (talk) 18:09, 6 November 2011 (UTC)Apass[reply]

An automated Wikipedia link suggester has some possible wiki link suggestions for the Apiaceae article, and they have been placed on this page for your convenience.
Tip: Some people find it helpful if these suggestions are shown on this talk page, rather than on another page. To do this, just add {{User:LinkBot/suggestions/Apiaceae}} to this page. — LinkBot 10:40, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Apiaceae reportedly counters the adverse (carcinogenic) properties of aflatoxin

[edit]

The wiki article on aflatoxin mentions Apiaceae and links to this article (which brought me here), yet (at least after a cursory glance over this article) I find no mention of aflatoxin and Apiaceae's role in countering the carcinogens produced by aflatoxin here, and thought it might be worth adding. Norlns22 (talk)

Boris Lariushin/plagiarism charges

[edit]

Interesting blog post that refers to this Wikipedia article:

http://stories.rbge.org.uk/archives/1321 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.111.254.17 (talk) 13:55, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest this article gets renamed

[edit]

I suggest this article gets renamed as "umbelliferae" as I would suggest that more people probably know this plant family by this name. Many plants in this family, such as celery or carrots, are famous for their bell-shaped tops (hence this name). ACEOREVIVED (talk) 19:16, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How about Apiaceae (Umbelliferae)? I guess this might be seen as setting a bad precedent, but surely an exception should be made in this case. Nihola (talk) 19:12, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Since Umbelliferae redirects here, changing the name is unnecessary. Peter coxhead (talk) 14:11, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Good enough. Nihola (talk) 06:07, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Distribution

[edit]

Does anyone know anything about distribution? Are Apiaceae species found on every continent? etc... Hypershock (talk) 04:45, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Apiaceae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:40, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why is Centella not referenced here since now that Centella is now placed in the Apiaceae family

[edit]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centella 2001:448A:6060:A89:BD22:2C5C:E0C4:712C (talk) 16:01, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is correctly included in List of Apiaceae genera. Peter coxhead (talk) 21:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]