Talk:Svadhishthana

Yoga Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Yoga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Yoga, Hatha yoga, Yoga as exercise and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YogaWikipedia:WikiProject YogaTemplate:WikiProject YogaYoga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hinduism Low‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Buddhism Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

according to who?

This page seems very authoritative in ascribing a location to the swadhisthana chakra. I wonder where exactly it gets such authority?

I think a much better idea of the location of the chakra comes from this website:

http://www.phoenixcentre.com/bodywork/bodywork3-2chakra.htm

Now, let me just say that I have nothing to do with these Phoenix Center people. I am an independent yoga/meditation practioner, and on that dubious authority, I am telling you that this Phoenix Center site is right and the current Wikipedia page is wrong.

Of course in matters such as these there is no ultimate authority. I understand that the format of the wikipedia page might be more understated than the Phoenix Center page, but correct aesthetics does not equate to correct information, unfortunately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.164.243.123 (talk) 16:16, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

seed syllables errors

Seed syllables written under the picture are not in order. What is right: the description or the picture, i didnt searched; anyways even the picture of the chakra differ from some other pictures i have found. At last, there are errors in this article. Finding a free-from-error source isnt easy it seems. Greeting to truth-seekers, saint-contributors and Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.7.56.138 (talk) 10:04, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not fit for wikipedia

This article, which is on pseudoscience, is violating the nPOV policy. It is very clearly written from a believer who did not even try being neutral. 2A02:8108:46BF:D640:442C:D39E:94FC:1666 (talk) 15:36, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]