Talk:TI-82

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

I saw on the Internet that this calculator will be discontinued shortly. At approximately when?? Late 2004?? 2005?? 66.245.119.206 00:24, 26 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

I would be surprised if the TI-82 survived the launch of the TI-84 Plus. Expect it to be discontinued within three months. Grunt 17:02, 2004 Jun 4 (UTC)

Two out of 3 months have gone by since this message was wrote. Interestingly, here is a problem. True or false: something that can be concluded given that the TI-82 (which began in 1993) survived all the way to 2004, whereas the TI-80 and TI-92, both of which began in 1995, did not, is that the TI-82 was a very popular calculator. 66.245.125.9 22:48, 2 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Now the 3 months are nearly over; in fact, only a week left before the 3 months are over. What is the current status of this calculator?? 66.245.69.5 00:31, 28 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Now the 3 months are just ONE DAY SHORT of being completely over. Has TI mentioned any news about it?? 66.245.107.72 19:31, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)

No news about it... -- Grun t 🇪🇺 19:42, 2004 Sep 3 (UTC)

I got a message recently saying that they haven't been discontinued yet. I suggest we wait until the TI-85 Plus (or whatever the name of the model that is the upgrade to the TI-84 Plus) comes out, which probably won't be until at least 2007. 66.245.79.225 21:48, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Unimportant article. Boring too.

Explain why we have TI-81, TI-83, TI-83 Plus, TI-84 Plus, etc., then. They are real objects and they do have real importance. -- Grunt (talk) 15:19, 2004 Jun 26 (UTC)

TiCalc.org no longer points to a useful site, so I have removed its link in the TI-82 article. -Chrono 04:30, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That was an april fool's joke. Link re-added. --72.145.221.129 10:04, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why doesn't the article mention TI-82 STATS (a blue model). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.113.126.104 (talk) 22:35, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, I have a TI-82 stats, they come from 1999, and I'm not really sure if they have anything to do with the TI-82 - they come with more complex numbers, distributions and the ability to shade above or below graphics, they seems more like a TI-83, but with a lower version number and only a release in some parts of the world, geographically. 82.32.196.210 (talk) 19:18, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A bit of misinformation on this article

The TI-82 was actually a stripped down version of the TI-85, not an updated version of the TI-81. The TI-82 WAS designed to replace the TI-81 though.