Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surprise sex
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 15:13, May 21, 2005 (UTC)
This is per its own defintion not different from rape.
- Delete. Not enough information to convince me that it's any different from rape. Doozer 22:31, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Plus there's no indication the term is used anywhere except northeast Scotland. Rlw 22:40, May 15, 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to rape. -- BD2412 thimkact 22:47, 2005 May 15 (UTC)
- Redirect to Rape. JYolkowski // talk 22:52, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - unless verified, never heard of it - and I'm Scottish. I don't know that a redirect to rape is appropriate - whether 'sex without consent' is always rape has been a contentious point of law in Scotland and elsewhere. --Doc Glasgow 22:59, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not merge, nothing here worth merging. Gmaxwell 01:10, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for obvious reasons--Heathcliff 03:12, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no redirect, no merge. --Angr/comhrá 04:51, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no merge or redirect. -Sean Curtin 04:57, May 16, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, unverifiable. Megan1967 06:23, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, unverifiable Klonimus 07:19, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Stancel 18:25, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete GeeZee 23:07, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to sex. Jessicab 02:48, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Rape. I'm willing to accept that I don't know the Scots use this term in the way it's described, but I don't think there's enough difference to separate them. --Unfocused 03:39, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Question: If this is unnotable or unverified - then does it merit a redirection anywhere?--Doc Glasgow 09:17, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm willing to accept that the original poster may have information about which I am currently ignorant, for the tiny cost of a redirect. If it weren't so similar to a current article, I'd also say delete, which is a result here that would not disappoint me. With all the VfD spam re: schools, I don't have the time to research my foggy recollection of a recent news article regarding non-consensual sex being defended as something other than rape. --Unfocused 12:35, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Question: If this is unnotable or unverified - then does it merit a redirection anywhere?--Doc Glasgow 09:17, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Begin article removal. For those who don't know, "article removal" is removal of an article from Wikipedia. It is often confused with deletion. Article removal is simply the removing of an article and its history from wikipedia following a vote on the issue in which a consensus to remove the article is made. It is a colloquial term used only by R. fiend. -R. fiend 21:48, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.